Search results

  1. S

    Track I-485 Approvals (After new Name Check 180 day rule)

    Please read a topic "180 NC Rule is still valid" at http://www.trackitt.com/discussion-forums/i485-1/107589195/last-page/.
  2. S

    Track I-485 Approvals (After new Name Check 180 day rule)

    Approximately one hour ago I have received 3 messages for me and for my family: Details in the signature below. My whole path: J-1+2YHRR --> O-1 --> J-1 waiver (NOL) --> H-1B --> I-485/EB1-OR --> GC. Good luck.
  3. S

    USCIS started to approve older cases

    +1, but with a small correction. It should be ND (notice day) but not RD. In many cases this difference is small (one day or so), but for summer 2007 filers this difference may be as much as 2 months. RD this is mailroom time and ND is time when data were entered in the USCIS system. So USCIS...
  4. S

    For all those with back ground check pending for more than 180 days

    The USCIS has released a revised Q&A on their change in policy concerning FBI name checks (http://imminfo.com/resources/namecheck.pdf):
  5. S

    Name check completion not required for I-485 Adjudication

    It looks like the Aytes Memo on Feb 4, 2008 starts to work. USCIS aprroves first WoM cases. Congratulation!
  6. S

    I don't think CIS has started approving EB AOS based on the memo

    Agree. Wait at least one weak more ...
  7. S

    Any LUD in NSC after New NC Memo

    http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=24696, http://www.durrani.com/docs/Questions.pdf, http://boards.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=274643.
  8. S

    Any LUD in NSC after New NC Memo

    http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/DOC017.PDF, http://immigrationportal.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=17270&d=1202337346, http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/name_check_faq-20feb08.pdf.
  9. S

    Spoke to IO at TSC this afternoon

    "USCIS has begun identifying the cases affected by this policy modification in each field office and service center. Each office will evaluate the pending cases and will adjust their workload accordingly. USCIS anticipates that the majority of the cases that are subject to this policy...
  10. S

    USCIS Ombudsman resigns

    Links: http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1203100416411.shtm, http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=24663
  11. S

    Spoke to an IO at TSC...

    http://www.shusterman.com/pdf/rsc105.pdf, http://boards.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=255364, and http://boards.immigration.com/showthread.php?t=220814.
  12. S

    Question about namecheck timing

    I got two responses from FBI on my letteres to First Lady and our Congressman.
  13. S

    Trackitt is down

    In the same time immigration Forum 'Privet' (http://forum.privet.com/viewforum.php?f=1) is also down :(.
  14. S

    Question about namecheck timing

    Just an example - look on my signature ... However this is not a common case.
  15. S

    Stuck in Name Check??? Let's track it

    Not a big deal for USCIS. Recall how many I-485 they approved during one week (or even during a weekend) just before "VB fiasco" in summer 2007.
  16. S

    Track I-485 Approvals (After new Name Check 180 day rule)

    It depends. See my signature.
  17. S

    Name check completion not required for I-485 Adjudication

    A good estimation. Actually 155,592 = 329,160-117,819-55,729 (Ibid., Figure 10, page 38). Also take into account that this value includes applications for naturalization (N-400), family-based, and also retrogressed I-485 applications. They will not affect on the available visa numbers for EBGC...
  18. S

    Name check completion not required for I-485 Adjudication

    Hi, michvin. This was published in USCIS Ombudsman 2007 Annual Report: http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/CISOMB_Annual_Report_2007.pdf
  19. S

    Are we parolee?

    I don't agree with you. During AOS (I-495 pending) you don't need to have valid visa status (H-1B/H-4) or valid I-94:
  20. S

    Stuck in Name Check??? Let's track it

    Is it your opinion ("IMHO")? Otherwise, could you please provide a source of this information? Thank you.
Top