Recent content by mrz

If there is a draft, which is very unlikely, I don't know why to lose sleep over it? Even if you are in your home country, you might have to go to war if required. Same holds true here. I wouldn't run out of this country, like a coward, if required to go to war. Hey, that's me! Don't want to...

I don't think one has to reside consecutively for 2.5 years. It should be 30 months out of the last 60 months. Here are the condensed requirements: 1. Have to reside continuously as a lawful permanent resident in the U.S. for at least 5 years prior to filing with no single absence from the...

You can state it from 1997 as it's not going affect your application. Since you were with the same employer during that time, it is better to give that info. If I were you, I will put it from 1997.

When you show the Drivers License for photo ID, why would that be a problem? I am in NJ for several years now and never had any issue. As far as drivers license is concerned, it really depends on the DMV center or the person that you are dealing with at that center. It's sick but true. The...

With I-551 stamp, you can travel to US without a problem. You don't need AP or EAD any more as you are a PR. When you go for stamping, you have to surrender all your EAD/AP's to the officer. Please look at the following link for residency requirements...

Hmmm, I even lost track of where we started and how far we have drum-rolled this discussion? The topic was "How risk is job change after 3-4 months?". I thought we were discussing that even if one uses AC-21, they have to have the intent of working for the AC-21 employer. The *employer* and...

Your arguments are very misleading. At one time, you say that the law does NOT even require you to work for the employer but you have to have the intention and later you say that use the 90 day rule to be safe. What is it? If the LAW DOES NOT REQUIRE ONE TO WORK FOR THE EMPLOYER BUT ONLY...

How do you prove the intent if you don't even work for one day after the adjudication? Man, I am becoming like JoeF responding to each and every post... No offence JoeF but really admire your persistence and wonder how you are able to keep it up for so long and still continuing... I am...

Maybe, you are lucky that they didn't ask you. I know they have asked all sorts of docs from the AC-21 employer. Well, that's speculative, isn't it? Where does the intent of working with the employer or AC-21 employer come into picture after the GC is approved? Employee is free to go the...

Of course! The employer has to support the application by providing all the docs that are requested by USCIS when requested. That's one obligation. Second one would be that they have to classify that the job offered is exactly the same as supported by LC. Don't you think it puts them on...

AC-21 employer has no other obligation? Then, tell me why does USCIS have to have that restriction... How do you measure the intent after getting GC if there is no obligation with the AC-21 employer? Basically, you are saying that you apply in AC-21 and you are free to go on the day your 485...

Not true. If the AC-21 employer refuses to provide financial docs or any other relevant docs when requested by USCIS, then the application gets denied. Don't you agree?

Then tell me this, why do they have to have this restriction at all? The employee has to work for any employer at the time of adjudication not after that? C'mon, GC is based on future employment. Do you agree? Intent of working with the *then* employer should also exist. Do you agree...

What is the best part about it?

I agree completely that even with AC-21, the law requires a sponsor. Or else, they can cut the sponsor off and the employee loose, right? Hmmm, I don't know why the members are divided on this topic even when it looks obvious. Well, *intelligent* minds think in *intelligent* ways :D...