New DHS practice in decreasing a USCIS backlog

AlexusHome

New Member
Just a few days ago I received an NTA in removal proceedings under section 240. Maybe it was a routine practice, but I haven't heard this before.
I have a pending asylum application since 2022 Entered with a valid B2 visa, in 3 months after applied for the political asylum. No violations, criminal records, or something like this. Last time I updated the EAD in Dec of 2024. The NTA states that me and my family have unauthorized stay after our authorized stay under visas was ended in Feb of 2023. So, legally this statement is incorrect, because I have it after applied for asylum and received a notice.
In Oct of 2025 I received a notice to pay an annual fee, paid it, and receive again the status "The next step is in-person interview". And in 10 days after I received the notice for the payment, I received the NTA.
Also, I also found several posts on reddit that I'm not alone in this situation and the DHS started this movement to overwhelm courts...
 
Last edited:
Just a few days ago I received an NTA in removal proceedings under section 240. Maybe it was a routine practice, but I haven't heard this before.
I have a pending asylum application since 2022 Entered with a valid B2 visa, in 3 months after applied for the political asylum. No violations, criminal records, or something like this. Last time I updated the EAD in Dec of 2024. The NTA states that me and my family have unauthorized stay after our authorized stay under visas was ended in Feb of 2023. So, legally this statement is incorrect, because I have it after applied for asylum and received a notice.
In Oct of 2025 I received a notice to pay an annual fee, paid it, and receive again the status "The next step is in-person interview". And in 10 days after I received the notice for the payment, I received the NTA.
Also, I also found several posts on reddit that I'm not alone in this situation and the DHS started this movement to overwhelm courts...
Reach out to a lawyer ASAP

I am assuming , Legally this NTA is wrong but they are playing on technical grounds,

Their thought process is, asylees entered under Biden administration were permitted illegal

But again, this is my assumption only. You need to talk to a lawyer immediately and figure this out


Also ask the same here, this person provides free of cost advice
 
Top