Participant
Registered Users (C)
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_uscmem.html:
05/04Yates memo gist?
Documents for ability to Pay:
Part1):Form I 140
art 5:For employer filed petitions:
Columns to have been filled by CO.
Date the business started, No.of employees, Gross/net income
(here both are to be filled or one can be filled is vague)
Initial evidence: 1) Annual reports 2) Federal Tax returns 3) Audited financial statements.
(At least One of these items).
If any of the above is missing RFE will be issued. (If some thing is missing here the person is more safe, since he can always send all extra info').
Part2)Incase Part1 is OK, the real issue starts here.
They will make a favorable decision, if proof of(one?)
a) Company’s net income=>offered wage. (if net income column is not properly filled by co.? or mentioned N/A??)
b)Company's current net asset=>offered wage.
c)Employed by Co. and current wage=offered wage.
Now the issues are:
1) As some private cos. will not let you know their financial documents and details submitted. never know it meets the criteria.
(Wait Keeping finger's crossed and praying)
2) Whether this is applicable even for the cases for which RFE's issued. (Fingers crossed)
3)I140 with RFE sent?.
Remind you about the recent Ohato memo and mix these two.
Earlier, if something is deficient, people can fall back on RFEs and further RFEs and save there 140s.
Expect to reduce back log which way?
Boon or bane?
05/04Yates memo gist?
Documents for ability to Pay:
Part1):Form I 140
art 5:For employer filed petitions:Columns to have been filled by CO.
Date the business started, No.of employees, Gross/net income
(here both are to be filled or one can be filled is vague)
Initial evidence: 1) Annual reports 2) Federal Tax returns 3) Audited financial statements.
(At least One of these items).
If any of the above is missing RFE will be issued. (If some thing is missing here the person is more safe, since he can always send all extra info').
Part2)Incase Part1 is OK, the real issue starts here.
They will make a favorable decision, if proof of(one?)
a) Company’s net income=>offered wage. (if net income column is not properly filled by co.? or mentioned N/A??)
b)Company's current net asset=>offered wage.
c)Employed by Co. and current wage=offered wage.
Now the issues are:
1) As some private cos. will not let you know their financial documents and details submitted. never know it meets the criteria.
(Wait Keeping finger's crossed and praying)
2) Whether this is applicable even for the cases for which RFE's issued. (Fingers crossed)
3)I140 with RFE sent?.
Remind you about the recent Ohato memo and mix these two.
Earlier, if something is deficient, people can fall back on RFEs and further RFEs and save there 140s.
Expect to reduce back log which way?
Boon or bane?
Last edited by a moderator: