|  Forums Home |  Immigration.com Home  |  Immigration.com FAQ  |   Immigration.com Updates  |  
Disclaimer: We take no responsibility for accuracy of information provided. Please use at your own risk.
NOTE: Please do not post any negative comments or remarks about any person or organization. Failure to follow these instructions would be considered a consent for forums.immigration.com to share your login information, your IP address and other details with the aggrieved party.

    NOTE: FREE CONFERENCE CALL FOR IMMIGRATION RELATED ISSUES.

Go Back   ImmigrationPortal Forums > Immigrant Visas (Green Cards) > Family Based Green Cards - Through Marriage or a Relative

Family Based Green Cards - Through Marriage or a Relative Before posting a question here, please visit our FAQ to see if your question is answered here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1st March 2006, 12:21 PM
patty579 patty579 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 688
When exactly are you considered overstayed?

My visa expires by the end of March, but we have to wait for a couple of things, before we can mail the petition/application.. probably for another 2 weeks.

Does the postal stamp on the application play a role here or do they take the date when I received their receipt notice for my application? Would I be considered overstayed if I sent it BEFORE my visa expired, but they didn't send the receipt notice until AFTER my visa expired?

Thanks in advance for any comments!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 1st March 2006, 07:58 PM
patty579 patty579 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 688
Does anyone know?

I've been trying to find posts with a similar topic, but no-one seems to be too sure about overstaying.
I've also read here many times that overstays are forgiven if you are married to a USC. But on my instructions to I-485 it says that you are not eligible to apply if
"Your authorized stay expired before you filed this application".

What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 1st March 2006, 08:50 PM
ari4u ari4u is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,195
This is what i read from the instructions of the I-485.

You are not eligible for adjustment of status if any of the following apply to you:

You failed to maintain your nonimmigrant status, through no fault of your own or for technical reasons; unless you are applying because you are:
-- An immediate relative of a United States citizen (parent, spouse, widow, widower or unmarried child under 21 years old)



This mean you are eligible to apply for I-485 as you are the spouse of a USC eventhough you overstayed your visa.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 1st March 2006, 09:00 PM
patty579 patty579 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 688
Thanks Ari. I didn't even see that, to be honest.
In general, I find the instructions very confusing sometimes. I mean, isn't it contradicting itself??

But your reply definitely made me stop worrying about this now, so thanks again!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 1st March 2006, 09:29 PM
ari4u ari4u is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,195
I dont think it is contradictory. This form is used by various categories of applicants to adjust status and there is an eligibility criteria every applicant has to meet in order to file I-485. Being the immediate relative of a USC, a lot of those restrictions do not apply to you and you can still apply for I-485 and adjust your status even if you do not meet the eligibility criteria mentioned.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 1st March 2006, 11:37 PM
Suzy977 Suzy977 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by ari4u
This is what i read from the instructions of the I-485.

You are not eligible for adjustment of status if any of the following apply to you:

You failed to maintain your nonimmigrant status, through no fault of your own or for technical reasons; unless you are applying because you are:
-- An immediate relative of a United States citizen (parent, spouse, widow, widower or unmarried child under 21 years old)



This is what kind of concerns me, the way they put it: "through no fault of your own or technical reasons".
So, for example if my parents tourist visa expires and they decide to stay, that, in my opinion is their fault and it's not covered under the above provision?!?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 1st March 2006, 11:42 PM
rex1960 rex1960 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 313
Send a message via Yahoo to rex1960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzy977
This is what kind of concerns me, the way they put it: "through no fault of your own or technical reasons".
So, for example if my parents tourist visa expires and they decide to stay, that, in my opinion is their fault and it's not covered under the above provision?!?
the key in this case is unless they are immediate relatives of a USC
__________________
Nationality German, Married to a USC
I-130, I-485, I-765 to Chicago Lockbox
12/27/05 RD MSC-06-091-xxxxx
01/04/06 ND
02/13/06 FP & Bio (NOA ND 01/23/06)
02/27/06 EAD card received
05/01/06 Interview (NOA ND 03/08/06)
05/01/06 Legal Permanent Resident
05/22/06 GC received via mail


"You aren't only responsible for what you're doing
but also for what you're not doing
" Lao Tzu

всяк своего счастья кузнец
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 2nd March 2006, 12:48 AM
Suzy977 Suzy977 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by rex1960
the key in this case is unless they are immediate relatives of a USC
I totally agree with you.
But they don't say "failed to maintain nonimmigrant status PERIOD" they aded that b.s. regarding "no fault of your own" or "technical" reasons, this is what worries me!?!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 2nd March 2006, 01:14 AM
rex1960 rex1960 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 313
Send a message via Yahoo to rex1960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzy977
I totally agree with you.
But they don't say "failed to maintain nonimmigrant status PERIOD" they aded that b.s. regarding "no fault of your own" or "technical" reasons, this is what worries me!?!
It is a matter of logic and grammar.

There are two different cases in the first place:

1) You are an immediate (direct) relative or not. In this case you might overstay your visa even if it's your own fault

2) You are NOT an immediate realtive. In this case you better don't overstay your visa.

Don't worry to much and please don't put too much into it.
__________________
Nationality German, Married to a USC
I-130, I-485, I-765 to Chicago Lockbox
12/27/05 RD MSC-06-091-xxxxx
01/04/06 ND
02/13/06 FP & Bio (NOA ND 01/23/06)
02/27/06 EAD card received
05/01/06 Interview (NOA ND 03/08/06)
05/01/06 Legal Permanent Resident
05/22/06 GC received via mail


"You aren't only responsible for what you're doing
but also for what you're not doing
" Lao Tzu

всяк своего счастья кузнец
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 2nd March 2006, 01:26 AM
Suzy977 Suzy977 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by rex1960
It is a matter of logic and grammar.

There are two different cases in the first place:

1) You are an immediate (direct) relative or not. In this case you might overstay your visa even if it's your own fault

2) You are NOT an immediate realtive. In this case you better don't overstay your visa.

Don't worry to much and please don't put too much into it.
Thank you.
You know with INS nothing is clear, White or Black, there are too manny gray shades...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 2nd March 2006, 01:31 AM
rex1960 rex1960 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 313
Send a message via Yahoo to rex1960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suzy977
Thank you.
You know with INS nothing is clear, White or Black, there are too manny gray shades...
I beg to differ. I find it pretty clear and it's a law you can rely on even if it's not clear what human officers, immigration lawyers and posters here make of it. At least at the appeal court somebody's going to look at the clear text of the law. That's one of the things that made me emmigrate to the US and not to some banana republic
__________________
Nationality German, Married to a USC
I-130, I-485, I-765 to Chicago Lockbox
12/27/05 RD MSC-06-091-xxxxx
01/04/06 ND
02/13/06 FP & Bio (NOA ND 01/23/06)
02/27/06 EAD card received
05/01/06 Interview (NOA ND 03/08/06)
05/01/06 Legal Permanent Resident
05/22/06 GC received via mail


"You aren't only responsible for what you're doing
but also for what you're not doing
" Lao Tzu

всяк своего счастья кузнец
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 2nd March 2006, 02:04 AM
Suzy977 Suzy977 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by rex1960
I beg to differ. I find it pretty clear and it's a law you can rely on even if it's not clear what human officers, immigration lawyers and posters here make of it.

That's the problem, when things become gray...

At least at the appeal court somebody's going to look at the clear text of the law.

That's good, but the question is: Do you want to go all the way to the appeal court?

That's one of the things that made me emmigrate to the US and not to some banana republic
I came to this country for everything else but the Immigration Law and the immigration process

In Canada since 1990 till now, with the score I have, I could've became a citizen, maybe 5 times, over and over and over...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 2nd March 2006, 04:18 AM
princesskate princesskate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by ari4u
This is what i read from the instructions of the I-485.

You are not eligible for adjustment of status if any of the following apply to you:

You failed to maintain your nonimmigrant status, through no fault of your own or for technical reasons; unless you are applying because you are:
-- An immediate relative of a United States citizen (parent, spouse, widow, widower or unmarried child under 21 years old)



This mean you are eligible to apply for I-485 as you are the spouse of a USC eventhough you overstayed your visa.
How about unmarried child over 21 years old? A friend of mine is over 21 years old, unmarried, his mum (permanent resident, planning to apply citizenship this May) has filed I-485 for him since August 2001 (his case is now in Family based 2nd (b) priority, will change to 1st priority once his mum is naturalized) however his F-1 visa is expiring soon. Would he be placed a 3/10 year bar?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 2nd March 2006, 12:29 PM
patty579 patty579 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by rex1960
I beg to differ. I find it pretty clear and it's a law you can rely on even if it's not clear what human officers, immigration lawyers and posters here make of it.
I still think it is difficult for most people to see through that legal lingo. Law language is something you really have to get used to first. There is a huge handbook on the USCIS website, where it seems like it is explained to officers how to read and use their laws! So apparently it does deserve explanations.

Once you know what it means, it surely is the clearest and most reliable thing in the world, which is good. It's just that many people are intimidated and confused the first couple of times they read the laws and instructions.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 2nd March 2006, 12:37 PM
rex1960 rex1960 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 313
Send a message via Yahoo to rex1960
Quote:
Originally Posted by patty579
I still think it is difficult for most people to see through that legal lingo. Law language is something you really have to get used to first. There is a huge handbook on the USCIS website, where it seems like it is explained to officers how to read and use their laws! So apparently it does deserve explanations.

Once you know what it means, it surely is the clearest and most reliable thing in the world, which is good. It's just that many people are intimidated and confused the first couple of times they read the laws and instructions.
I know, patty. That's why people should take their time and read very carefully through all those instructions. You can always come here and ask but how would you know that the info you're getting here is straight to the point and covers your individual case other than doing some research on your own.
I strongly believe in the concept of doing your own efforts and homework. Even if you get assistance by immigration lawyers they could tell you whatever without you knowing that it's utter BS just to get your cash.
However, some people here appear as if they've never been to that USCIS website before at all. I know that's not true for you, though.
__________________
Nationality German, Married to a USC
I-130, I-485, I-765 to Chicago Lockbox
12/27/05 RD MSC-06-091-xxxxx
01/04/06 ND
02/13/06 FP & Bio (NOA ND 01/23/06)
02/27/06 EAD card received
05/01/06 Interview (NOA ND 03/08/06)
05/01/06 Legal Permanent Resident
05/22/06 GC received via mail


"You aren't only responsible for what you're doing
but also for what you're not doing
" Lao Tzu

всяк своего счастья кузнец
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 2nd March 2006, 01:23 PM
patty579 patty579 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 688
Well of course everybody should read for themselves first. Otherwise you won't be able to differentiate here between people who know what they are talking about and people who don't.

Also I hope I will become one of those who know what they are talking about, in order to help others here in the future. And you just can't unless you read the sources over and over.

In the end, it's just so good and reassuring to compare what you read with the interpretations of those people who know what they are talking about!! I mean that's mostly why I am here.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 2nd March 2006, 11:38 PM
ari4u ari4u is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,195
trust me... when i was getting ready to fill the forms, it took me a coupla days, so many re-reads of the instructions, scouring the posts of this forum day and night before that clarity finally dawned on me. It felt like i was high on dope when i finally understood what was required The most confusing part was the I-864 which i wouldnt have understood without the help of the gurus here .
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 3rd March 2006, 12:12 PM
patty579 patty579 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 688
Quote:
Originally Posted by ari4u
trust me... when i was getting ready to fill the forms, it took me a coupla days, so many re-reads of the instructions, scouring the posts of this forum day and night before that clarity finally dawned on me. It felt like i was high on dope when i finally understood what was required The most confusing part was the I-864 which i wouldnt have understood without the help of the gurus here .
lol and now you are a guru yourself!
I totally know what you are talking about. It feels SO good, when you realize you finally understand what is being said in some forms.
Sadly I still feel like I have a long way to go. I'm telling you, my first celebration will be on the day I submit my AOS package!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 22nd May 2006, 01:30 AM
cat001 cat001 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1
authorized stay expired?

Quote:
Originally Posted by patty579
Does anyone know?

I've been trying to find posts with a similar topic, but no-one seems to be too sure about overstaying.
I've also read here many times that overstays are forgiven if you are married to a USC. But on my instructions to I-485 it says that you are not eligible to apply if
"Your authorized stay expired before you filed this application".

What do you think?
This is also my question. I understand that an immediate relative of USC can overstay. But that dose not seem to overrule expiration of your anthorized stay which I believe is given by I-94. Any comments? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 22nd May 2006, 05:24 AM
GotPR? GotPR? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Campbell CA
Posts: 3,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by cat001
This is also my question. I understand that an immediate relative of USC can overstay. But that dose not seem to overrule expiration of your anthorized stay which I believe is given by I-94. Any comments? Thanks!
Please do not consider IR of USC CAN overstay. It is still illegal. They must not overstay, but they are forgiven FOR HUMANITARIAN REASON TO US CITIZEN. Forgiven overstay does not overrule I-94 expiration(guess what will happen if immediate relative left the US after more than 180 days overstay), however, one is eligible to I485. Once one can file I485, they are in authorized stay.



Quote:
How about unmarried child over 21 years old? A friend of mine is over 21 years old, unmarried, his mum (permanent resident, planning to apply citizenship this May) has filed I-485 for him since August 2001 (his case is now in Family based 2nd (b) priority, will change to 1st priority once his mum is naturalized) however his F-1 visa is expiring soon. Would he be placed a 3/10 year bar?
He already is under AOS pending(his F1 is not supposed to be valid) .
__________________
EB2, rest of the world.
LC(RIR) PD : 4/29/02
LC(RIR) Approved : 11/17/04
I485/I140/EAD/AP RD : 12/15/04
FP : 1/9/05
AP Approved : 2/17/05
EAD Approved : 3/26/05
I485/I140 Approved : 5/24/05
I-551 stamp : 6/3/05
Plastic Card RD : 6/28/05

Last edited by GotPR?; 22nd May 2006 at 06:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 22nd May 2006, 06:04 AM
GreenCardVirus GreenCardVirus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 750
Overstay starts when your I-94 expires and there is NO application pending with USCIS with "latest" "receipt date" of that application as expiry date of I-94.

IF the pending application is denied, then overstay starts from day of I-94 expiry.

Types of pending application could be extension of status, change of status type.
__________________

Priority Date: June, 2002 (3rd GC Attempt)
EB2, 485 ND: 6/10/2004
Case Transferred to Local Office on 10/4/2006
485 Approved: 5/2006
Card Received: 02/13/2007
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 22nd May 2006, 08:52 AM
justnew justnew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 187
Hope you guys are not getting the whole issue mixed up:
Even if your non immigrant visa expires and your I94 is still current you are still considered legal, it is only when you overstay the period on your I94 that you are considered overstay and problably become illegal.
__________________
01/12/06--- Married to USC
03/24/06--- RD
03/29/06--- ND
04/17/06--- FP for I-175 & 1-485
04/12/06--- RFE date (04/08/06)
04/28/06----RFE Received
07/11/06----Approved but pending name check
08/20/06----Welcome notice mail
08/28/06----GC Received
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 22nd May 2006, 01:59 PM
cherr1980 cherr1980 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,272
I don't think they are mixing anything...but your non-immigrant status is not valid anymore when you apply for adjustment of status. You will be in an authorized stay by the Attorney General. That is why you need (if you are not H1B or other dual intent visa) an Advance Parole to re-enter the US after you are in AOS because your non-immigrant visa even is not expired is not valid anymore.

If you pass the period of authorized stay by your I-94 you start acruing illegal presence but the clock stop when you apply for adjustment of status or another pending application that give you a period of authorize stay (does not count for I-130 application that does not give you any status). Anyway the time that you were overstay is forgiven if you are an immediate relative ONLY for the purpose to still be eligible to apply for AOS, is not forgiven for other terms, like even if you have an approved Advance Parole you can be bar for re-enter the country if you overstay more than 180 days, etc.

Last edited by cherr1980; 22nd May 2006 at 02:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 22nd May 2006, 03:09 PM
ari4u ari4u is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,195
I completely agree with Cherr and GotPR... being the immediate relative of a USC does not give you the right to overstay your I-94 date.

In general...
One is inelgibile to file I-485 if he/she overstayed the I-94 date or worked illegally. Being the IR of a USC only pardons overstay and illegal employment in order for the IR to be eligible and apply I-485 and get into a legal status.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 22nd May 2006, 03:30 PM
patty579 patty579 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 688
I'm still kind of confused, not about what is illegal and what not, but about when my stay is being considered overstay.
Sorry if I am just being slow, but see my case for example:

My I-94 expired March 31th this year. But my ND for AOS is March 29th, which makes me legal, correct?
Still, I have stayed almost two months longer than my I-94 allowed. Have I overstayed, even though I was never really unlawfully present?
Or are you always overstaying when you stay longer than your I-94 allows?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 22nd May 2006, 03:50 PM
ari4u ari4u is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by patty579
I'm still kind of confused, not about what is illegal and what not, but about when my stay is being considered overstay.
Sorry if I am just being slow, but see my case for example:

My I-94 expired March 31th this year. But my ND for AOS is March 29th, which makes me legal, correct?
Still, I have stayed almost two months longer than my I-94 allowed. Have I overstayed, even though I was never really unlawfully present?
Or are you always overstaying when you stay longer than your I-94 allows?
You filed your AOS before your I-94 expired. This means you continued with your legal status and never overstayed.

When you stay beyond your I-94 date, it usually means you are overstaying unless you applied for AOS which gets you back in legal status. Dont worry, you are in a valid legal status now.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 22nd May 2006, 04:02 PM
cherr1980 cherr1980 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,272
Okay, let's go again...don't worry, is kind of confusing.

In your particular case you did NOT acrue any illegal/unlawful presence nor overstayed, because you apply for adjustment of status BEFORE the expiration date of your I-94. You apply for a change of status, your status from non-immigrant to immigrant and that gives you an authorize stay. Overstay only counts if you were still as a non-immigrant with NO pending application.

Anyway, are you going to apply for I-131, is that your worry?

Probably this chart will help you a little bit:
http://www.utmem.edu/international/out_of_status.html

http://www.hias.org/Immigration/Answers/overstay.pdf

Last edited by cherr1980; 22nd May 2006 at 04:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 22nd May 2006, 04:29 PM
patty579 patty579 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 688
Thanks so much Ari and Cherr, I finally understand. How amazing!
Until today I thought I was overstaying!

I probably won't leave the country until I received my GC, but you're right, Cherr, it was my worry. My aunt was pretty sick and I was worrying about applying for an AP, just in case I need to go home.
Good to know that I could apply for AP, if I needed to. So thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 22nd May 2006, 04:42 PM
cherr1980 cherr1980 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,272
Can be confusing sometimes. I applied like one month before the expiration of my I-94 but never apply for I-131 because I was not in need of it (plus my husband was concern about the part of "no guarantee" about it), but later on we thought it could be helpful to have an AP since nobody knows when an emergency can come up, but well, we waited until the interview, everything went well.

Good luck,
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 22nd May 2006, 04:53 PM
dicion dicion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4
Personal Experience, hopefully this will help

My wife's I-94 expired Dec 8th 2005. We got married Dec 6th 05.
So, technically, we were relatives before it expired

We didn't file for AOS until December '06.. due to many things.

So technically, she was here without any visa at all for about a year.

She was just approved for AOS to PR Today (see TimeLine Below)
__________________
I'm a USC, but my Wife is from Finland.
Here's her track so far:

12/28/05 RD for I485&765
1/05/06 ND for I485&765
02/15/06 RFE for crap I already sent *sigh*
2/24/06 RFE Response Recieved
3/10/06 FP (Code 3)
3/29/06 I765 Approval Notice mailed(online)
3/31/06 I766 Card Recieved (88 Days)
5/22/06 AOS Interview
5/22/06 *STAMPED PERMANENT RESIDENT*
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Would This be considered FRAUD Glady Family Based Green Cards - Through Marriage or a Relative 2 2nd January 2007 12:36 PM
What is it considered out of status?--Pl HELP greencard36 General I-485 and Related Issues 0 1st June 2005 02:52 PM
Will this be considered a GC fraud or something ? fdfd Life After The Green Card 0 11th May 2005 10:37 PM
When is it considered a GC complete econnect General I-485 and Related Issues 1 20th October 2004 03:17 PM
Can my I-485 be considered abandoned? rxd272 General I-485 and Related Issues 3 22nd July 2003 12:33 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1993-2009, All Rights Reserved