|  Forums Home |  Immigration.com Home  |  Immigration.com FAQ  |   Immigration.com Updates  |  
Disclaimer: We take no responsibility for accuracy of information provided. Please use at your own risk.
NOTE: Please do not post any negative comments or remarks about any person or organization. Failure to follow these instructions would be considered a consent for forums.immigration.com to share your login information, your IP address and other details with the aggrieved party.

    NOTE: FREE CONFERENCE CALL FOR IMMIGRATION RELATED ISSUES.

Go Back   ImmigrationPortal Forums > Immigrant Visas (Green Cards) > I-485 Issues > I-485 Issues Common to All Services Centers > Visa Bulletin and Priority Dates Retrogression Issues

Visa Bulletin and Priority Dates Retrogression Issues

For Priority Dates FAQ, please see FAQ


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th September 2005, 05:05 PM
PainCard PainCard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 190
Thought on Making a Valid Point in front of legislators

Currently, As we stand-There is no plan to increase the quota at this time. There is always the chance that this will change.

Contact your legislators to make sure that they appreciate the problem. Remember that they may be more influenced by the impact on American economy and business than on the plight of immigrants.

In 2000, the US Congress recognized that slow government processing hurt American competitiveness. In the years after 9/11, changes in background clearance checks and government inefficiencies led to a much lower than usual number of approvals.

Only in the most recent fiscal year did the government start to approve residence requests within the 180 days demanded by law. But the pent up demand of so many years of mishandled cases was more than the normal annual supply of visas could support.

The Congress should authorize at least a temporary increase equal to the numbers unusued in previous years when the government failed to approve cases within the 180 days required by law. That temporary increase would most likely be sufficient to take care of what is probably an artificial surge of applications caused by government mishandling in the past.

Let's present it to our legislators.
__________________
LC PD Nov 02-EB3 India (TSC)
I140/I485 ND 09/16/04 LUD 06/27, 28 & 30, 2007
I140 AD 02/08/05 LUD 07/07/2007
FP1: 03/10/05
FP2 (Code-3): 02/16/06
FP3 (Code-3) 06/27/07
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16th September 2005, 05:16 PM
neha_wal neha_wal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 116
http://www.house.gov/

I urge everybody contact their representatives here's the link to find out your area's rep.
http://www.house.gov/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legislators should now about this 2004 study for The State Dept. henri97 Political Asylum in USA 3 20th January 2005 08:29 AM
ISN Legislative Lobbying Efforts for Email to Legislators Edison General I-485 and Related Issues 19 13th October 2003 04:23 PM
ISN Legislative Lobbying Efforts for Email to Legislators Edison General I-485 and Related Issues 3 12th October 2003 09:49 PM
ISN Legislative Lobbying Efforts for Email to Legislators Edison General I-485 and Related Issues 0 12th October 2003 08:23 PM
ISN Legislative Lobbying Efforts for Email to Legislators Edison General I-485 and Related Issues 0 12th October 2003 08:21 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1993-2009, All Rights Reserved