Deleted
Deleted
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:13 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
You're worried about a dismissed citation? You were never arrested, so you have no criminal record. A record of an old dismissed citation is not the same as a criminal record.
Stop worrying about a dismissed citation from 2004.
Sent N-400 7/28/07
PD 7/27/07
Check cashed 12/5/07
NOA 12/7/07
FP notice 1/4/08 (received 1/10/08 )
FP Date 1/30/08 (walk in done on 1/26/08 Charlotte)
IL: 6/10/08
ID: 8/28/08 (Durham DO) Passed!
OL: 9/23/08
OD: 10/06/08![]()
PP: 10/21/08 (applied)
PP: 11/1/08 (received)
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTE: I am a Volunteer Moderator - one of you. I am not a lawyer. So act accordingly.
Thanks a lot!
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:15 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
You never were presented with a ticket at the time of the incident, not were you ever knowingly charged with anything. The landlord likely filed a property damage claim against you just in case you decided not to pay for the damage. You paid for the damage, and the citation was dismissed.
You're not expected to disclose any claims against you that weren't aware of at the time.
Sent N-400 7/28/07
PD 7/27/07
Check cashed 12/5/07
NOA 12/7/07
FP notice 1/4/08 (received 1/10/08 )
FP Date 1/30/08 (walk in done on 1/26/08 Charlotte)
IL: 6/10/08
ID: 8/28/08 (Durham DO) Passed!
OL: 9/23/08
OD: 10/06/08![]()
PP: 10/21/08 (applied)
PP: 11/1/08 (received)
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTE: I am a Volunteer Moderator - one of you. I am not a lawyer. So act accordingly.
Thanks a lot.
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:20 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
Thanks.
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:22 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
You're worrying way too much. If your accent isn't so thick that people are unable to understand, you'll be fine.
They grant some leeway for your own wording as long as the content of the answer is correct. And you only need to get 6 out of 10 answers correct, so even if they mark you wrong for 1 or 2 questions because they didn't accept your modified wording you're still OK if you can answer the others well enough to get 6 right. And even if you fail to get 6 out of 10, you can retake the civics test at a later date without paying the fee or being fingerprinted again.
Last edited by Jackolantern; 21st March 2012 at 12:01 AM.
PD: Jan 2003 (EB3 rest of world)
I-485 Approved: July 2007
I am a layman, not a lawyer. What I write here is not official or professional legal advice. In addition, my answers on this forum are specific to the scenarios discussed in each thread and should not be generalized to other situations.
What's about my first question - do they usually schedule interview after the 5 year anniversary?
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:23 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
You really are worrying too much! You are a university professor who has no problems communicating with her students and colleagues - your accent will not prevent you from passing the English section of the exam. As you've mentioned earlier, most immigrants who came here as adults have some type of accent. If having an accent resulted in automatic failure of the English exam, can you even imagine how many reports of failed interviews would be posted on this website?
Based on your previous posts, you have a very straightforward case. I recommend taking a few deep breaths and relaxing in a comfortable armchair with a cup of tea - you have absolutely nothing to worry about!![]()
USC as of 09/09/08
I am not an lawyer. My advice is based purely on personal experience. For legal advice, please consult an immigration attorney.
I would say same thing as other posters have suggested - accents shouldn't be a issue at all. I know many people in their old age and it was very difficult for them to even remember those 100 questions and still they passed without any issues so for cases like yours, I doubt if it would become an issue at all.
In my experience, IO was very friendly and didn't try to put me in uncomfortable spot at all. so don't worry about accent part at all.
Not sure but if at all interview is scheduled b4 your 5 yr anniversary, they would put your case under RFE status and once 5 yr anniversary is reached, they would put it back in regular queue. To be on safer side, apply 80-85 days before your 5 yr anniversary (not 90 days before).What's about my first question - do they usually schedule interview after the 5 year anniversary?
Regards,
S K Ghori
skg@vex.net
http://www.vex.net/~skg/
**NOTE**
I underwent the immigration process in both Canada and the US. I hold Pakistani, Canadian and US citizenship.
**DISCLAIMER**
I am neither a lawyer nor an immigration consultant. My comments should NEVER be considered as legal or professional advice as they are not meant to be such.
Deleted
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:26 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
The poster above didn't describe the possible issue clearly enough. In some jurisdictions the processing is so fast that some people go from application submission date to interview in as little as 70 to 80 days. So if you apply earlier than 70 days before the 5-year anniversary, there is the possibility of being interviewed before the 5 year anniversary. If that happens, they can't approve you on the spot, they must put your case on hold until you've reached or passed the 5 year mark. When they do that, you might see the online status change to RFE, but it's not really RFE it's just being placed on hold.
Of course, you have to hope that if they put the case on hold, it doesn't collect dust and remain on hold for months and months. Fortunately there is a section of the law known as 1447(b), which mandates USCIS to decide your case within 120 days after the interview, and you have some recourse to force them to expedite the processing if it's still pending after 120 days post-interview.
That list should be more than enough, unless you've had extended travel outside the US in the past 5 years. Don't show all those documents to the interviewer. Whatever you show, show it only if the interviewer specifically asked for it, or if the interviewer appears to not be believing or understanding something you're saying and you feel a particular document would clarify or prove your verbal answer.Have I missed anything important that the other people take to the interview?
They won't ask for that. They're not concerned about legal part-time jobs done by full-time university students. For completeness he can tell the interviewer about that job since it was omitted from the N-400, but they won't ask for any proof of it.My son's file will contain all the same, except for marriage & divorce certificates. We got a letter from his temporary part-time employer (we missed to mention this fact in his N-400 - he is a full-time Univ. student).
Nothing from high school. It's also very unlikely he'll be asked for anything from his university either unless it's a university outside the US or outside the state of his primary residence (your state of residence is normally considered to be his state of residence if you're supporting him financially while he studies).Do we need to get letters from his former high school and his present University where he studies? Does he need to provide his student ID card?
Last edited by Jackolantern; 22nd March 2012 at 06:23 AM.
PD: Jan 2003 (EB3 rest of world)
I-485 Approved: July 2007
I am a layman, not a lawyer. What I write here is not official or professional legal advice. In addition, my answers on this forum are specific to the scenarios discussed in each thread and should not be generalized to other situations.
Jackolantern, thanks a lot for detailed response!
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 21st May 2012 at 11:41 PM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
I just want to say, RELAX! Also, just hope the interviewing officer's accent is understandable!
Delete
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 13th June 2012 at 07:29 PM.
Deleted
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:31 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
Deleted
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:32 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTE: I am a Volunteer Moderator - one of you. I am not a lawyer. So act accordingly.
PD: 9/12/2000 (EB3/VA/RIR/Canada)
I-140 RD: 12/22/2000
I-140 AD: 7/16/2001
RD: 8/28/2001
ND: 10/26/2001
FP1: 1/31/2002
RFE: 8/2/2002
RFE RD: 8/28/2002
TD: 10/22/2002
FP2: 6/19/2004
ID: 07/15/2004
AD: 07/15/2004
CO: 08/18/2004
CR: 08/23/2004
N-400 RD: 05/21/2009
FP: 06/13/2009
CFR: 08/05/2009
IL: 08/21/09
ID: 10/7/09
USC: 10/8/09
Wow, you are professional worrier!
A the interview they're not going to make you stand up at a wall and measure your height. As long as you're in the ballpark they won't care. Height can vary by an inch based on spinal compression, and non-high heel shoes can add another 1 or 2 inches, so even if they measured you a 2-inch difference won't matter.
PD: Jan 2003 (EB3 rest of world)
I-485 Approved: July 2007
I am a layman, not a lawyer. What I write here is not official or professional legal advice. In addition, my answers on this forum are specific to the scenarios discussed in each thread and should not be generalized to other situations.
TO: Jack and the Canadian:
"Why all the hostility. guys?"
![]()
I have said it,too.
Remember:
"Is worrying a hobby or an affliction?"
Deleted
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:33 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
The reason why they ask for your driver license is to verify your address. As everyone has already stated, don't worry about a slight height discrepancy. Based on your posts, I surmise that you have a very straightforward case. You are worrying about things that don't warrant worrying about.
USC as of 09/09/08
I am not an lawyer. My advice is based purely on personal experience. For legal advice, please consult an immigration attorney.
A 2-inch height difference is more like a difference in hair color or a 15-lb difference in weight -- it's ignorable. A different eye color or gender is another matter altogether.
For non-marriage cases they often don't ask for the DL at the interview. If they ask, it's usually because there is some reason for doubt about your address, such as if you had extensive travel abroad, or you work in state outside your state of residence or you listed a recent address change on the N-400. Bring your passport and GC, and keep your DL inside your wallet unless asked. If you have lived and worked in the same state for years and didn't change address in the past year, I expect that they won't ask for your DL.I have no idea to what level of accuracy they compare documents. If they ask for DL, there should be a reason for that! Isn't GC enough then? It is also an identification document.
Last edited by Jackolantern; 4th April 2012 at 09:28 AM.
PD: Jan 2003 (EB3 rest of world)
I-485 Approved: July 2007
I am a layman, not a lawyer. What I write here is not official or professional legal advice. In addition, my answers on this forum are specific to the scenarios discussed in each thread and should not be generalized to other situations.
Deleted
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:35 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
Deleted
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:38 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
There is no employment-based naturalization, other than military employment. You're only filing with the standard 5 year rule, which is independent of employment.
Note that spouses of US citizens can apply for marriage-based naturalization regardless of whether the green card was obtained through marriage or employment or otherwise.
Are you referring to the request for the DL on the yellow letter?4) They might have been asking for the DL because of the recent (1 year ago) moving to another apartment within the same town.
That letter often has boilerplate text that doesn't apply to the individual. What counts is what the interviewer asks for. At the interview, the interviewer may ask for more than what's on that letter, or ignore some of what is on the letter. Of course you should bring the DL in case they ask for it, but its mention on that letter doesn't mean the interviewer will ask for it.
PD: Jan 2003 (EB3 rest of world)
I-485 Approved: July 2007
I am a layman, not a lawyer. What I write here is not official or professional legal advice. In addition, my answers on this forum are specific to the scenarios discussed in each thread and should not be generalized to other situations.
Deleted
Last edited by Marusia_GC; 15th April 2012 at 01:39 AM.
GC: 05/02/07
DO: St. Louis, MO
02/03/12 0 N400 -> Phoenix, AZ
02/06/12 3 NA rcvd
02/14/12 11 FPL -> "Initial review"
02/17/12 14 FPL for 02/29/12
02/29/12 26 FP done
03/31/12 57 YL (DL)
04/09/12 68 "In line for interview"
04/25/12 84 IL sent out
04/30/12 89 IL rcvd
06/01/12 121 Interview +
06/12/12 133 "In line for oath"
07/05/12 156 OL sent out
07/07/12 158 OL rcvd
08/03/12 185 Oath, Citizen
08/15/12 Appl. for Passp.
08/27/12 Passp. Rcvd
DO: San Antonio, TX
05/04/07 (-5 yrs + 90): GC
02/04/12 (0) : N-400 mailed to Dallas, TX with USPS
02/08/12 (4) : N-400 delivered
02/13/12 (9) : Check cashed
02/15/12 (11) : NOA recvd
02/15/12 (11) : FP notice mailed
02/17/12 (13) : FP notice recvd
02/17/12 (13) : FP done (walk-in)
03/31/12 (56) : YL received (DL)
04/06/12 (62) : Online Status changed to "Testing and Interview"
04/06/12 (62) : IL mailed
04/23/12 (79) : IL recvd
05/14/12 (100) : Interview
06/28/12 (145) : Oath
I'm surprised that this thread has not been locked yet.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks