Hello All,
My mother is over 71 years old and she went for the N-400 interview yesterday at Chicago DO office. My brother-in-law went with her and requested if he could accompany her. The IO, a lady officer in her late 40's said 'No'. But, we saw many people accompanying with the candidates.
Anyways, my mother went in at 12:15 PM (She was scheduled at 11:05 AM) . It seems that initially, everything went on well - She had to do her oath and sat down and gave her GC and passport. Then the IO asked 6 questions - my mother answered them all.
1. What is supreme law of the land?
2. Who wrote constitution?
3. When was constitution written?
4. What is your state Capital?
5. Name 2 wars we fought in 1900's?
6. Who did US fight in World war II?
Then, IO said congratulations - you passed your US History and Civic test.
My mom said since her FP did not go through well, she had certificates from police department (from our town and county) and the IO said 'Oh that is good' and took them and put them in the file.
Then, she took her application and was going through the application. My mother said that she is came from a small village in India and did only little bit of schooling and never had to read English in school etc and also she has been so depressed as my father died about a few months back, so that the IO would be easy on those 'Yes/No' questions as my mom is not really comfortable but she knew answers well enough for those 'No' as she knew the meaning in our native language. She also knew 'Yes' for those questions like respect to flag, support US Govt etc. The IO went through first few pages, went through my dad's name, their wedding date, where and when he died etc. She was satisfied and finally went to these 'Yes/No' questions. She was asking all these one by one and asking the meaning for each one of them, asking my mom to explain as she was telling 'No' to these questions. I think, when she came to Q 15, she asked about violence and my mom said no. IO asked her to explain what is violence and what is crime and wanted a few examples. My mother said she is not involved in violence and in any crime and she is always like to be peaceful. But she insisted meanings and examples. Then, my mom said fighting, killing etc but she wanted more explanations and finally, she gave her N-652 where she checked the first box - You passed the Test of English and US History and Government. and 4th one on the form - You will be given another opportunity to be tested on your ability to speak and understand English. and finally a check box on B - A Decision cannot be made about your application
I waited for the officer and spoke with her to know what exactly happened. She said that my mom was able to communicate but not able to express properly some of the meanings and definitions etc. I couldn't understand what she was up to as she gave N-652 and mentioned that she passed the test of English and US History and Government and the again saying that she would be given another opportunity to be tested to speak and understand English, which is contradicting.
It seems that my mom would be called again for interview to test in English and these 'Yes/No' questions after 60 days.
Do you know anyone had this kind of experience? I do not understand what a 72 year old lady would do after mastering English - they expect her run for any federal office or work on important Govt projects?
Can we write to our senator and request him to look into this? What do you guys suggest? Please help us!
Thanks
My mother is over 71 years old and she went for the N-400 interview yesterday at Chicago DO office. My brother-in-law went with her and requested if he could accompany her. The IO, a lady officer in her late 40's said 'No'. But, we saw many people accompanying with the candidates.
Anyways, my mother went in at 12:15 PM (She was scheduled at 11:05 AM) . It seems that initially, everything went on well - She had to do her oath and sat down and gave her GC and passport. Then the IO asked 6 questions - my mother answered them all.
1. What is supreme law of the land?
2. Who wrote constitution?
3. When was constitution written?
4. What is your state Capital?
5. Name 2 wars we fought in 1900's?
6. Who did US fight in World war II?
Then, IO said congratulations - you passed your US History and Civic test.
My mom said since her FP did not go through well, she had certificates from police department (from our town and county) and the IO said 'Oh that is good' and took them and put them in the file.
Then, she took her application and was going through the application. My mother said that she is came from a small village in India and did only little bit of schooling and never had to read English in school etc and also she has been so depressed as my father died about a few months back, so that the IO would be easy on those 'Yes/No' questions as my mom is not really comfortable but she knew answers well enough for those 'No' as she knew the meaning in our native language. She also knew 'Yes' for those questions like respect to flag, support US Govt etc. The IO went through first few pages, went through my dad's name, their wedding date, where and when he died etc. She was satisfied and finally went to these 'Yes/No' questions. She was asking all these one by one and asking the meaning for each one of them, asking my mom to explain as she was telling 'No' to these questions. I think, when she came to Q 15, she asked about violence and my mom said no. IO asked her to explain what is violence and what is crime and wanted a few examples. My mother said she is not involved in violence and in any crime and she is always like to be peaceful. But she insisted meanings and examples. Then, my mom said fighting, killing etc but she wanted more explanations and finally, she gave her N-652 where she checked the first box - You passed the Test of English and US History and Government. and 4th one on the form - You will be given another opportunity to be tested on your ability to speak and understand English. and finally a check box on B - A Decision cannot be made about your application
I waited for the officer and spoke with her to know what exactly happened. She said that my mom was able to communicate but not able to express properly some of the meanings and definitions etc. I couldn't understand what she was up to as she gave N-652 and mentioned that she passed the test of English and US History and Government and the again saying that she would be given another opportunity to be tested to speak and understand English, which is contradicting.
It seems that my mom would be called again for interview to test in English and these 'Yes/No' questions after 60 days.
Do you know anyone had this kind of experience? I do not understand what a 72 year old lady would do after mastering English - they expect her run for any federal office or work on important Govt projects?
Can we write to our senator and request him to look into this? What do you guys suggest? Please help us!
Thanks